Thursday, June 26, 2008

Agenda Pakatan BAbi menidakkan Islam di Malaysia



Teresa Kok dan Pakatan BA.bi sudah makin berani berkurang ajar dengan Islam dan orang-orang Melayu.

Di beritakan di dalam dewan undangan negeri Selengor, Teresa Kok telah mengepalai satu petisyen penduduk di Puchong kepada Datuk Satim Diman (Sri Kembangan) mengenai aduan penduduk bukan Islam terhadap laungan azan subuh yg didakwa menggangu ketenteraman penduduk.

Inilah wawasan Pakatan BA.bi, menjalankan agenda DAP semata-mata. Makin lama makin terserlah dan makin amat kurang ajar kepada penduduk Melayu dan Bumiputra dan Islam sebagai agama rasmi.

Yang menyedihkan, wakil-wakil rakyat Islam Pakatan BA.bi yang duduk bersama2 sebagai ahli dewan undangan negeri Selangor sebagai kerajaan negeri tidak langsung membantah bila isu ini diketengahkan. Manakala orang-orang UMNO yg cuba membantah petisyen ini diperintah duduk oleh speaker(bukan Islam).

Makin lama makin terserlah kepada rakyat Selangor sebenarnya Menteri Besar Selangor adalah Teresa Kok dari parti DAP kerana beliau banyak mempengaruhi keputusan dewan undangan negeri. PKR hanyalah menjadi keldai, manakala PAS menjadi unta DAP.

PAS tidak langsung menampakkan agenda perjuangan Islam yang dilaung2kan, dan Hassan Ali langsung tidak ambil peduli. Walau bagaimanapun kita tahu ADUN PAS di Shah Alam sibuk memperjuangkan hak membina gereja dengan menggunakan duit kerajaan negeri.

Heran bin Ajaib bilamana PAS sibuk menjalankan agenda DAP.

dari blog Dr. Khir Toyo:
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3453891503510104639&postID=5996161554276366332

"Memang terdapat memorendum yang ditandatangani oleh penduduk di sekitar Puchong mendesak kerajaan pakatan rakyat mengadakan undang undang mengurangkan volum azan disurau dan masjid di situ,salah seorang exco kerajaan negeri telah setuju dan akan bawa dalam mesyarat exco kerajaan pakatan rakyat,yang membimbangkan saya kerajaan pakatan rakyat hari ini mendasari perinsip kesamarataan jika ini digunakan tidak salah bagi mereka utk mengarahkan masjid surau mengurangkan volum suara azan demi keselesaan orang bukan islam .

Wednesday, June 25, 2008"

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Kedah MB stands firm on logging in the Ulu Muda forest reserve

How can PAS runs the country, if the first thing they can think of to make money is to cut down trees! The same thing happened in Terengganu when PAS took over in 1999. PAS never learns. Don't go for short cuts, use your brain how to make money!

This Azizan was the strongest protestor against the cutting of trees when the BN was in power, now that he is in power, it is OK? What a bunch of hypocrites PAS politicians are!!!





Kedah MB stands firm on logging in the Ulu Muda forest reserve
By : Adib Povera

ALOR STAR: Menteri Besar Azizan Abdul Razak is defiant about cutting trees in the Ulu Muda forest reserve. "Now, even if the Federal Government gives us the RM100 million compensation, we will still cut down the trees," he said.

Azizan told his critics that they should not be too obsessed with caring for the environment "like parents who are extremely obsessed with their offspring".

"The child is so pampered that he does not need to go to school. The child does not want to leave home.

"This is like our forest. We are too obsessed with preserving the trees that we don't cut them.
"We leave the trees till they get old and rot. The trees die and fall and affect the growth of others."

As for Kelantan counterpart Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat's advice on the matter, Azizan said that the Pas spiritual leader might have misunderstood his plans to chop down the valuable timber trees in the water catchment area, which is about twice the size of Singapore.

It was reported yesterday that Nik Aziz was concerned there would be shortage and pollution of water if the forest reserve was logged.


Azizan's other critic was Penang chief minister Lim Guan Eng who was concerned that logging in the forest reserve would deplete the water supply to Penang.

Some 63,000 padi farmers also protested against Azizan's plan. Others included the Penang-based Sahabat Alam Malaysia, and the Kedah branch of the Malaysian Nature Society.

Azizan, when reminded that he had strongly opposed a logging plan for the forest reserve when the former Barisan Nasional state government had proposed using helicopters to fell timber trees in 1992, said the circumstances were different then.

He said when he was the state opposition leader, he was not well informed on the matter.

"Just like many now, I had thought then that the entire water catchment area would be logged.

"Then, Kedah did not have many financial problems and the proposed logging was just to add more funds to our coffers.

"Today, the situation is different and we need funds to run development programmes for the people."

He said his plan would depend on the outcome of an environmental impact assessment study. For every hectare of the forest reserve, only three trees would be chopped.

Azizan was not considering other ways, including raising quit rent or assessment rates, to replenish the state coffers.

"We promise we won't sacrifice the environment. We will find the best way to log the forest reserve."

He thanked his critics for their concern.

Meanwhile, Penang has expressed its strongest objection against the Kedah government's logging plans.

In a press conference in George Town last week, Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said he was against Kedah doing so as the move would lead to catastrophic effects, particularly at the Muda Dam.

PERJUMPAAN MELAYU BERHEMAH bersama Ku Li




http://www.mykmujohor.com/

Kelab Veteran Melayu Negeri Johor & Kelab Veteran UMNO Bahagian Pulai
Dengan Takzimnya Menganjurkan
Majlis “PERJUMPAAN MELAYU BERHEMAH” bersama
Y.B.M. Tengku Tan Sri Razaleigh Hamzah

Tarikh & Masa: Sabtu 28hb Jun 2008, Jam 2.30 petang

Tempat: M-Suite Hotel, Johor Bahru

Pakaian: Semolek-moleknya Baju Kebangsaan Melayu
MOHON DIPERSUDIKAN

Petronas

We know who have been focusing and diverting all attention and blaming Petronas. It is Pak Lah the PM, Khairy Jamaluddin the Son-in-Law, Shahrir Samad the Minister-in-Law and off course Kamaluddin the Son on behalf of Scomi. We wait whom they have set aside to take over Petronas gate from Tan Sri Hassan Marican. Imagine getting the mother load of RM80 billion in taxes per year. Even now, Pak Lah has been lanun-ing Petronas coffer but must go thru TS Hassan first, imagine if he, KJ and Kamaluddin get to have their own gatekeeper. The Terengganu Oil Royalties can no longer be burglarized with Idris Jusoh, the Badawi's gatekeeper being replaced by Mat Said.. so now Dollah, KJ and Kamaluddin must plunder straight to the source!


Posted by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad at June 24, 2008 7:32 AM

www.chedet.com


Certain members of Parliament are focusing on Petronas, apparently trying to divert attention from Government over the thoughtless increase in oil prices. If I am not mistaken this is a prelude to appointing a 4th floor candidate as head of Petronas as they did when removing Tengku Mahaleel of Proton.

There is also an attempt to blame me for "advising" the Government on removing the subsidy. I would like to clarify again that although I am called Adviser to Petronas, I do not advise at all, least of all to the Government.

Once in a while I get a briefing from Tan Sri Hassan Marican, the President of Petronas. I also get the annual report which is available to the public. My main job is that of a post box. I pass on to Tan Sri Hassan numerous requests and proposals which people send to me. I have absolutely no say in the decisions made by Petronas.
During the time I was Prime Minister, Petronas reported to me and I made certain decisions e.g. the price of gas to be sold to power stations, the need to go abroad for oil exploration and production. To keep electricity price low I did not allow gas price to be increased. Petronas sustained losses but not much as crude prices were around US30 dollars per barrel. Today it is US139 dollars per barrel. Gas prices have likewise increased so that losses sustained by Petronas is much higher. That is for the Government and Petronas to sort out.

The public may have noticed that only Petronas supplies Natural Gas for Vehicle (NGV) for motor vehicles. The amount is also limited. This is because sale of NGV incurs a bigger loss to Petronas as the Government did not reimburse. The other oil companies refuse to sell gas as they would lose money at the price fixed by the Government during my time.

I have an office at the Petronas Towers and I am paid an allowance of RM15,000 per month, less RM5,000 income tax. If the Government wants me to step down now that I am not an UMNO member it is welcome to do so.

It would be a pity if politics is brought into the management of Petronas. Unlike other national petroleum companies Petronas has become one of the international petroleum companies like Shell, Essso, Total and others.

It operates in 36 different countries worldwide and its business includes upstream and downstream activities, onshore and offshore. One-third of its revenue comes from foreign operations. It is a Fortune 500 company listed at around 250.

If the 4th Floor takes over, Petronas may suffer the same fate as most national petroleum companies. Petronas staff are very well trained and much in demand overseas. If they leave I am not so sure Petronas will continue to be the model national petroleum company that many oil producing countries desire to emulate.

BARBARIANS AT PETRONAS GATE!

By jamilmalik88

Petronas bashing is orchestrated.



The target is not PETRONAS, that’s what they want everybody to think. The target is Tan Sri Hassan Merican, PRESIDENT and CEO of PETRONAS.

Before I answer your question why, let me take you a few years back.

Immediately after Pak Lah took over from Tun Dr. Mahathir as of 31.10.2003, a small consulting firm named BINA FIKIR was invited to make a presentation to Pak Lah to present their views of Malaysian Economic situation back then. Subsequent events lead to another, soon they were meeting EVERY OTHER DAY, of course all these with the help from KJ, PM Son-in-Law. There were so many proposals from BINA FIKIR that even the Government senior officers couldn’t keep up. Meanwhile, a plan was hatched to tell the Malaysians that there is NO MORE MONEY IN TREASURY SO ALL PROJECTS ARE HALTED INCLUDING DOUBLE-TRACKING, SINGAPORE CROOKED BRIDGE AND MANY MANY MORE!

But Pak Lah tells Malaysian that an action plan is in place as he called for the General Election in March 2004.

MR. CLEAN won the election in 2004 by breaking records for UMNO as well as BARISAN.

Earlier newspaper reports were focusing on FOCUSING on KHAZANAH NASIONAL BERHAD performance and after several collective comments on Khazanah, Pak Lah announced that the MD, Datuk Anwar Aji, of Khazanah is to be replaced by Azman Mokhtar on June 1, 2004, barely 2 months after election.

AZMAN was the brain and the MD of BINA FIKIR.

Datuk Anwar was given Chairman of Faber Group Berhad.

It was planned so well that people hardly noticed.

KJ was successful in planting his people at Khazanah Nasional Berhad and now has access to ALL THE ASSETS OF KHAZANAH.

Khazanah passive policy on its investments were changed almost overnight.
They were allowed to use their assets as securities to raise monies for INVESTMENTS OVERSEAS.

Invest they did into the billions of ringgits thru certain investments advisors which makes tonnes on advisory fees and services.

Personal greed is difficult to satisfy!

PETRONAS is by far the richest company and most profitable in Malaysia.
PETRONAS has won several accolades as the BEST MANAGED COMPANY too.
PETRONAS is in the Fortune 500 companies.

And Tan Sri Hassan Marican is a tough nut to crack.

To replace Tan Sri Hassan is not an easy tasks.
So when the opportunity comes, KJ & CO took full advantage to bash PETRONAS.

Using mass media which he controls, using many bloggers to plant hate mails into various local sites and even to the extent of spreading sms-es sent nationwide to boycott Petronas stations and productes, he is seeing the desired results.

He further attack Petronas for not being transparent in the annual account, which is strange because Khazanah Nasional does not even publish its annual account. It is only Petronas being bashed.

Tan Sri Hassan came out defending PETRONAS saying accounts area available, only certain people refuses to read it!

Never before has Tan Sri Hassan has to defend himself. Defend he did, he tried, but Hassan does not have the power KJ has on the media.

Silly allegations were thrown at PETRONAS all with evil intention to make people angry at Hassan for the fuel hike which was actually the DOLLAH’s GOVERNMENT DECISION.

The modus operandi was similar to Khazanah Nasional, ONLY PETRONAS seems more difficult.

More attempts to unseat Hassan will be planned by these greedy people, and all they need is a wrong move by Hassan, so far he has done none of it.

ONCE THEY WIN, THEY WILL REPLACE HASSAN WITH THEIR OWN PEOPLE AND PETRONAS MONEY (OUR MONEY) WILL BE AT THEIR DISPOSAL!

Someone MUST STOP THESE CULPRITS. And don’t say I did not FOREWARN YOU.

BARBARIANS ARE AT THE GATES OF PETRONAS!

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Sultan Johor vs DAP kurang ajar

DAP makin hari makin kurang ajar. Bagus Sultan Johor berani buat tindakan terus. Jangan bagi muka langsung! Sultan Selangor juga harus buat begini untuk mengajar Teresa Kok/DAP dan puak2 PAS dan PKR yang amat kurang ajar. Daulat Tuanku! Begitu juga Yang Dipertua Pulau Pinang. Janganlah biarkan kaduk naik junjung.

Dari www.mykmujohor.com





Hari ini Utusan melaporkan , Tuanku Sultan Johor di dalam satu majlis Perasmian Kulai sebagai sebuah DAERAH, telah menegur secara langsung tindakan ADUN DAP Bentayan yang bertindak biadap, tidak mematuhi PROTOKOL dewan undangan negeri JOHOR.

Antara sebab utama Adun DAP Bentayan ini tidak mahu mematuhi protokol pemakaian Dewan Undangan Negeri adalah kerana tidak mahu mengenakan SONGKOK.

JIka DAP mahu orang-orang MELAYU menghormati ADAT -RESAM serta BUDAYA mereka, mengapa mereka tidak mahu menghormati ADAT_RESAM dan BUDAYA Melayu?
Adakah dengan memakai SONGKOK, ADUN DAP Bentayan ini akan menjadi ISLAM? Dangkal sungguh ADUN DAP dari MUAR ini?

Baginda SUltan dipetik sebagai berkata:

"Di sini kelmarin, ada yang tunjuk jaguh tak nak pakai baju (pakaian rasmi). Kalau nak (jadi jaguh), keluar dari sini (tunjukkan diri) sekarang,"
titah baginda semasa merasmikan pengisytiharan Daerah Kulai yang kini dikenali sebagai Daerah Kulaijaya, di sini hari ini.

Tuanku Sultan menyifatkan tindakan Adun DAP itu hanya mahu menunjuk-nunjuk, UNTUK menjadi JAGUH!

Daulat Tuanku!

Utusan
Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri Bentayan (DAP), Gwee Tong Hiang diarah meninggalkan dewan kerana tidak memakai pakaian seragam rasmi pada majlis perasmian pembukaan DUN Johor hari ini.





Arahan dikeluarkan oleh Speaker DUN, Datuk Mohamad Ali Hassan pada pukul 9.45 pagi sebelum acara perasmian disempurnakan oleh Sultan Johor, Sultan Iskandar Ismail. -

Penulis merasakan Adun DAP (Gwee Tong Hiang) ini mungkin merasakan dengan kemenangan merebut kerusi DUN Bentayan maka beliau berasa boleh melakukan sesuka hati tampa memahami tatasusila dan peradapan ketika menghadiri majlis rasmi, kemungkinan juga wakil rakyat ini cuba untuk mencabar ketetapan peradapan ketika menghadiri majlis rasmi yang dirasmikan oleh Sultan Johor. Adakah ini pendekatan yang akan di ambil dan dilaksanakan oleh kebanyakan wakil-wakil rakyat dari pembangkang, nilai-nilai ketimuran dan sifat-sifat menghormati majlis rasmi telah di abaikan dan di cemari.

Kalimah ALLAH: Bukan Bahasa Bible

Kenapa amat penting kalimah Allah TIDAK BOLEH DIGUNAKAN oleh puak2 bukan Islam di dalam penerbitan mereka untuk menggantikan "God". Sekiranya Dollah merelakan, kita harus menentang Dollah habis2an. Dollah kuat tidur dan taksub populariti akan sanggup menggadaikan agama Islam juga.

Sumber: Caw. Aqidah
PP (Ancaman Agama)

Isu berkenaan tuntutan pihak Kristian terhadap kerajaan Malaysia untuk
membenarkan mereka menggunakan kalimah Allah bagi tujuan penerbitan
bahan bercetak mereka masih lagi hangat diperkatakan. (Rujuk The Sun,
Ruangan Herald The Catholic Weekly )

Pihak yang menuntut mendakwa bahawa kalimah Allah ialah terjemahan
dari bahasa Inggeris yang mengunakan kalimah God di dalam bible Versi
English mereka.

Sekiranya tuntutan ini dipenuhi kita akan melihat di dalam bible Kristian
ayat-ayat berbunyi seperti berikut:-
“Engkau adalah Messias anak Allah yang hidup “
( Matius 16 : 16 )
“..Kerana ia telah berkata :Aku adalah anak Allah.”
( Matius 27 : 43 )
“ Kasih kurnia menyertai kamu dan damai sejahtera
dari Allah, bapa kita dan dari Tuhan Yesus ( Jesus )
Kristus. (Galatia 1 : 3 )

Serta banyak lagi ayat-ayat lain yang tidak perlu diperincikan di sini.
Jelasnya, dalam menangani isu ini, kita perlu merujuk kembali kepada fakta
sebenar. Iaitu, apakah bahasa asal penulisan kitab Taurat dan Holy Bible?
Berdasarkan fakta, bahasa asal kitab Taurat adalah bahasa Hebrew manakala
bahasa yang digunakan bagi penulisan kitab Holy Bible ialah bahasa Greek.
Kalimah tuhan dalam bahasa Hebrew ialah El, Eloh, Elohim dan juga
Yahweh.

Ini dapat diperhatikan menerusi Perjanjian Baru, di dalam The
Gospel of St. Matthew bab 27 : 46 yang menyebut :
Kira-kira jam tiga berserulah Yesus dengan suara nyaring:
“Eli,Eli, lama sabakhtani?”Ertinya: Allah-Ku, Allah-Ku,
mengapa Engkau meninggalkan Aku ?”

Manakala di dalam bahasa Greek pula perkataan yang membawa maksud
tuhan ialah Theos. Orang-orang Rom yang menyembah Tuhan yang
disepakati oleh mereka sebagai Tuhan yang sebenar memanggil Tuhan ini
sebagai Hotheos. Manakala sekiranya ada di kalangan mereka yang
menyembah Tuhan palsu, mereka akan memanggil Tuhan tersebut sebagai
Tontheos.

Perhatikan! Bagi kedua-dua bahasa yang dijadikan penulisan bagi kedua-dua
kitab suci ini, tidak terdapat satu pun yang menyebut kalimah Allah
Sesetengah sarjana Kristian menyatakan bahawa alasan yang paling kukuh
bagi mereka untuk dibenarkan penggunaan kalimah Allah ialah berdasarkan
penggunan kalimah Allah di dalam kitab Bible versi Arabic.
Sememangnya diakui kalimah Allah digunapakai di dalam Bible berbahasa
Arab. Bible versi bahasa Arab tidak dikenali sebagai Holy Bible tetapi Alkitab
Al-Muqaddas. Begitu juga Bible berbahasa Melayu yang
menggunakan nama yang sama? Di dalam terjemahan Bible bahasa Melayu
mereka menamakannya sebagai Al-kitab berita baik.*
Perlu dinyatakan bahawa kalimah Allah wujud di dalam Bible bahasa Arab
adalah kerana sesetengah Kristian Arab (seperti Syria, Mesir dan lain-lain)
yang wujud sebelum kedatangan Islam meyakini konsep Unity (Keesaan
Allah). Ia berbeza sama sekali dengan konsep Trinity (tiga dalam satu)
sepertimana doktrin kebanyakan Kristian pada hari ini termasuk mereka
yang terlibat dengan tuntutan isu kalimah Allah ini.
Maka hujah yang dijadikan sandaran sebagai alasan untuk membenarkan
mereka menggunakan kalimah Allah ini adalah tidak masuk akal kerana
golongan Kristian Trinity sendiri mengkafirkan golongan Kristian Unity.
Terdapat juga sarjana mereka yang menyatakan bahawa kekeliruan tidak
akan sekali-kali timbul jika penggunaan kalimah ini dibenarkan kerana
kalimah Allah yang hendak digunakan tersebut adalah merujuk kepada
penterjemahan dari kalimah God dalam Bible bahasa Inggeris sedangkan
kalimah Tuhan adalah terjemahan dari kalimah Lord.
Pandangan mereka ini juga mengelirukan malah bertentangan dengan apa
yang dinyatakan dalam Bible mereka. Persoalannya, apakah perbezaan
antara Allah dan Tuhan dalam agama Kristian?
Sekiranya mereka mendakwa bahawa Tuhan adalah merujuk kepada Nabi
Isa sedangkan Allah adalah merujuk kepada Tuhan Bapa di dalam syurga
maka mereka perlu mengetahui bahawa ayat yang akan dinyatakan di bawah
ini membuktikan bahawa kalimah Tuhan dan Allah adalah dua perkataan
yang merujuk hanya kepada Allah sahaja! Perhatikan di dalam The Gospel
Of St. Mark 12:29 menyebut :
Jawab Jesus : “Hukum yang terutama ialah : Dengarlah wahai
Bani Israel, Tuhan Allah kita, Tuhan Yang Esa”

Saya bertanya kepada orang-orang Kristian, siapakah Tuhan Yang Esa
yang dimaksudkan di dalam ayat di atas? Adakah Nabi Isa? Tidak! Lafaz
Tuhan yang dimaksudkan di atas adalah merujuk kepada Allah semata-mata.
Sekali lagi bertentangan dengan apa yang telah dinyatakan oleh sarjana
mereka bahawa kalimah Lord (Tuhan) di dalam Bible adalah merujuk
kepada Nabi Isa!

Sekiranya mereka berhujah dengan menyatakan bahawa dalil yang paling
jelas menunjukkan kalimah Tuhan adalah merujuk kepada Nabi Isa
sedangkan kalimah Allah adalah merujuk kepada Tuhan Bapa, iaitu seperti
dinyatakan di dalam The Gospel Of St.Matius 16:22 yang menyebut :
Tetapi Petrus menarik Jesus ke samping dan menegur Dia,
katanya :“Tuhan, (Jesus) semoga Allah (Tuhan Bapa)
menjauhkan hal itu”.

Maka mereka perlu menyelesaikan dahulu percanggahan di antara kedua
ayat yang telah dinyatakan tadi. Sama ada Tuhan itu adalah Nabi Isa sahaja
ataupun Tuhan juga adalah Allah!

Di samping itu, kita juga tidak lupa untuk menyeru agar mereka
memerhatikan kata-kata Jesus sendiri terhadap keesaan Allah. Perhatikan
The Gospel Of St.John 20:17 yang menyebut :
Kata Jesus kepadanya: Janganlah engkau memegang aku,
sebab aku belum pergi kepada Bapa, tetapi pergilah kepada
saudara-saudaraKu dan katakanlah kepada mereka bahawa
sekarang Aku akan pergi kepada BapaKu dan Bapamu,
AllahKu dan Allahmu.”

Dalam The Gospel Of St. Matthew 22:37 :menyebut :
Jawab Jesus kepadanya: “ Kasihilah Tuhan Allahmu dengan
segenap hatimu dan dengan segenap jiwamu dan segenap
akal budimu.

Dalam erti kata lain Nabi Isa bukannya Allah ataupun Tuhan Yang Maha
Berkuasa kerana Nabi Isa sendiri menyatakan bahawa Tuhan yang sebenar
ialah Allah!

Kesimpulannya, larangan terhadap penggunaan kalimah Allah yang
diwartakan menerusi keputusan kabinet yang bersidang pada 16 Mei 1986
adalah amat wajar. Empat perkataan dikhususkan hanya buat umat Islam dan
sama sekali tidak dibenarkan penggunaannya oleh Non Muslim iaitu Allah,
Solat, Kaabah dan Baitullah. Sesetengah negeri pula contohnya selangor,
telah menambah lagi beberapa perkataan yang dianggap mengelirukan
sekiranya digunakan oleh Non Muslim.

Jelaslah di sini kewajaran kerajaan Malaysia melarang penggunaan kalimah
Allah digunakan oleh Non Muslim yang bertujuan untuk mengelakkan
kekeliruan di kalangan masyarakat apabila terminologi yang tidak tepat
digunakan oleh mereka yang mempunyai kepentingan tertentu.